|
|
Post by Samantha Dawn on May 12, 2009 19:38:07 GMT -8
 Sighted earlier before the festivities began. Since has returned but felt it news worthy. I think her shopping habits may be exceeding her bank account. This last one had to hurt. |
|
|
|
Post by Brom Naomo on May 12, 2009 19:55:54 GMT -8
If she's returned, I don't understand exactly -how- you thought this was news worthy.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lord Galamushi Dawn on May 13, 2009 2:33:27 GMT -8
With each time the penalty increases. It nice to know how many times she's on. I am happy you don't decide whats news worthy around here or we might have as much news to offer as other papers. The fact that the status changed doesn't changed the fact that it happened. If that was the case why report anything, they often change with the wind anyways. So keep your remarks to the matter at hand not the reporter.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brom Naomo on May 13, 2009 2:47:25 GMT -8
I'm so glad I don't consider your opinion with sich high regard as well.  And whether the penalty goes up or not, I don't think it's really the number of times that matters, just the one where she doesn't come back. The concept at hand here, is nothing. She's not smited. There's nothing else to say other than "Why the fuck is this here?" Had there been some time in between, then -maybe- this could be considered some news. Thank you fer your opinion. You now have mine. Other people have theirs. So kindly... Fuck off.  |
|
Miranda Dawn
New Member
Say what you mean...mean what you say
Posts: 125
|
Post by Miranda Dawn on May 13, 2009 3:17:12 GMT -8
We don’t know how long she was DFC THIS time... could of been a day could of been a week... point is she was just deleted a few weeks ago.
The post didnt make it to the paper while her DFC status was still active because...well Sam had more important things to do that post it at the time it was found. So yeah looks like she almost got away with it without anyone knowing.
I know I WANT to know this and probably others who have recently fought against her would like to know as well.
I can let it go a one time DFC mistake...but to be slapped by RB twice in such a short time?
Due to this happening again in a matter of weeks I don’t what my character to interact with hers at all again and perhaps others that she has interacted with during this war feel the same way.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brom Naomo on May 13, 2009 3:25:10 GMT -8
[]OOC: Oh muh goodness. The crossing. It burns. []
Look. You don't want to deal with Occam. You don't have to. And as far as I'm aware, she's been in torpor here recently, so it's no surprise that this went about unnoticed to me. I'm not arguing the fact that this may have been longer than it seems. My point is that is was posted -after- she returned. S'the only issue I'm babbling about here.
Like Mushi said, S'good thing I don't run this paper. I'd be one bitchy mofo. And I'd most certainly have DFC's separate from other Obits, but s'not my forum. And I willingly accept this. I also accept that Coquette and Louvain encourage free speech, which, I rightly use, as do you three.
|
|
Miranda Dawn
New Member
Say what you mean...mean what you say
Posts: 125
|
Post by Miranda Dawn on May 13, 2009 3:35:59 GMT -8
To be honest DFC should be separate than the obits...because really how do you say what you need to without crossing? Yeah I know I should of used brackets or stated OCC but you got the point even though I didn’t.
So basically the human behind Sam should of just posted the DFC even though she knew RB handled it, then IF you character ss'ed her...your character could of posted... “Oh look she's back already”
I'll keep that in mind cause you guys always do nit pick the hell out of things.
|
|
kaio999
New Member
It may be that your death is simply a warning to others.[C01:F8F8FF]
Posts: 617
|
Post by kaio999 on May 13, 2009 3:36:45 GMT -8
Dear Lord childe.
|
|
|
|
Post by Brom Naomo on May 13, 2009 3:41:20 GMT -8
[]OOC: Once again. It burns!! []
And I'm not entirely what you mean by, "you guys" But yes. I nitpick the shit out of everything. Especially the announcement section. Why for? Because I can. The power of Douche compels me to ensure that people get their posts right.
Given most of my nitpickings are what I second sight on people, it shouldn't be my job to SS Occam and tell you all she's back when yer darling little Sam was so nice enough to post her DFC and state that she was back already.
|
|
Brutus
New Member
"Venimus Atque Infernum Nobiscum"
Posts: 182
|
Post by Brutus on May 13, 2009 4:34:20 GMT -8
Again, so soon, can someone please take this pire and show her how to get around the city...
|
|
Liander
New Member
Lead me, follow me, or get out of my way.
Posts: 430
|
Post by Liander on May 13, 2009 5:55:19 GMT -8
Alright children, enough bickering. Each of you go to your corners and pretend the others don't exist. Occam was DFC, now she's not. End of story. Glad to see you back, doll. |
|
|
|
Post by Brom Naomo on May 13, 2009 6:07:31 GMT -8
Now, now. Bickering would be far too piffle. And ignoring they didn't exist? That'd take the fun out of my morning by offering counter arguments to them  |
|
rel
New Member
byrren jous ninta yibinss wun ninta xo'a ulu kl'ae vel'bol zhah udosst..er'griff l' seke ph' shebali
Posts: 1,013
|
Post by rel on May 13, 2009 6:35:23 GMT -8
Seriously Alchemy didn't even get to send a cake to jail with a file! I'm not sure why anyone else is even bringing her jail sentence to light, especially when there are other things of nature who had also lost their land lease. I wonder how they could be put into a jail though. Would seem rather binding not to have root access...
|
|
Lisastrata
New Member
One who knows nothing can understand nothing.
Posts: 1,051
|
Post by Lisastrata on May 13, 2009 7:52:44 GMT -8
*shakes head* Grief...It's a good thing those three aren't actual reporters...
|
|
|
|
Post by Whitefang on May 13, 2009 8:41:58 GMT -8
Good to know this was all brought up with the 'pyre at question is gracefully taking her torpor.
|
|
