|
Post by Lestat de Lioncourt on Jun 11, 2009 17:23:57 GMT -8
Basically, tejas didn't want there to be an Archangel clone and wrote RB to get it deleted, because it was in the modded chats. Or maybe it's because of the obvious 22 thralls under ArchangeI in the span of ONE DAY that got him deleted? That's right, folks, obvious black blooding is still against the rules. Edited to add quote
|
|
Lameth
New Member
People say I make strange choices, but they're not strange for me. IGN:Lameth
Posts: 941
|
Post by Lameth on Jun 11, 2009 17:55:31 GMT -8
O.o But ALL black blooding is pretty obvious, lol
|
|
Damari
New Member
[C01:Yellow]
Posts: 1,410
|
Post by Damari on Jun 11, 2009 17:57:35 GMT -8
Black blooding itself isn't illegal. Posting your link into public forums and spamming it to get blood.
That is an offense. And now I'm confused again. Is this the THRALL that has been deleted or the actual Archie Archangel that has been deleted.
|
|
|
Post by Lestat de Lioncourt on Jun 11, 2009 18:13:24 GMT -8
It's a thrall, and:
Can I sign up more than one vampire?
As a general rule, no - if several vampires belonging to the same person act in concert (eg. attacking the same target, collecting money for use by one main vampire or pooling their resources in any other way, being sired by the same vampire), I may delete any number of them. That said, a couple of vampires acting fully independently is okay, and will go unnoticed. *Don't* have one sire the other (it's fairly obvious that that's cheating, yes? You can't get nutrition by draining your own blood!) Making lots of vampires for a friend (or an enemy) is also disallowed; the blood they gain will be removed, and the player who creates the false-vampires risks their main vampire being deleted.
|
|
|
Post by ArchangeI on Jun 12, 2009 0:45:04 GMT -8
This deletion is nothing, You can't kill the Lord of Capadocians... I'll be back!
|
|
Edan Adaire
New Member
And your point is?[C01:AF7817]
Posts: 1,566
|
Post by Edan Adaire on Jun 12, 2009 0:51:07 GMT -8
1. That's low.. even if its Clan Capadocious we're talking about here. 2. This is the OOC section, dude. Unless, you actually own a clan and its called "Capadocious" you aren't the Lord of Capadocians. This was retarded..
|
|
|
Post by ArchangeI on Jun 12, 2009 1:06:21 GMT -8
I am your Lord, Edan, Bryan, whoever! Now bow to me...peon! Else you'll feel the wrath of the Capadocians! 500 in 2! [pfftt]
|
|
rel
New Member
byrren jous ninta yibinss wun ninta xo'a ulu kl'ae vel'bol zhah udosst..er'griff l' seke ph' shebali
Posts: 1,013
|
Post by rel on Jun 12, 2009 4:30:23 GMT -8
Black blooding itself isn't illegal. Posting your link into public forums and spamming it to get blood. That is an offense. And now I'm confused again. Is this the THRALL that has been deleted or the actual Archie Archangel that has been deleted. it is a thrall, not one of his, and it was deleted because whomever was pretending to be archie came into the ghettos and was preforming lewd sexual acts. It's not funny, it's completely juvenile, and as one who's had the same thing happen to her character it causes a big fucking mess. you wanna fuck someone? do it as your own damn character... sorry - this shit really really pisses me off regardless of the feeling towards another player or their character. don't downplay it as meaningless fun, it's not funny. not one bit.
|
|
Damari
New Member
[C01:Yellow]
Posts: 1,410
|
Post by Damari on Jun 12, 2009 4:47:01 GMT -8
I thought it might be the case, but wasn't sure. This city is ripe with "But he did it first' excuses for reciprocal bad behaviour.
As if their responding wrong is more righteous because it's in response to an initial bad action.
|
|
Master Dracula
New Member
I don't need a reason to fight, I just need somebody TO fight![C01:551A8B]
Posts: 583
|
Post by Master Dracula on Jun 12, 2009 4:50:33 GMT -8
AA sexing ghetto peoples! I'd pay to see that!
|
|
CG Dragonfly
New Member
Luminous Dragonfly[C01:66CCFF]
Posts: 155
|
Post by CG Dragonfly on Jun 12, 2009 5:31:02 GMT -8
I'm with Sara (rel mun) here. I've seen at minimum 10 players when they found out someone had an alt with the name of their vamp, they flipped and
a) asked to have the alt b) asked the alt's name be changed c) had their vamp kick the snot out of the similar named vamp
That's especially when someone is using the alt to play as that vamp and screw up the rep.
|
|
|
Post by Majica on Jun 12, 2009 6:47:16 GMT -8
Louann/Tejas is such a hyprocrite. Yes... it's been 3 years now, but apparantly she forgets about the time she created a thrall in my name (yet I'm the one who harasses them) and tried to pass off some cockamamie story of Maji's name being the oooonly vampire name she could think of in the whole city to clone, while teaching her 8 year old daughter how to do it no less. Yeah.. right... lol.
It's not that her husbands charrie is 'Archangel' and not that he has this HUGE clan full of peeps with all kinds of creative names, and not that she, as her charrie tejas, was in a clan of her own (The Empire). But yeah.. here, let me believe Majica was the ooooonly persons name you could think of in the whooole entire city.
*chuckles* Hey, Louann.. obsess much - even back then eh?
Majica (5/9/2006 4:26:50 PM): ok... Majica (5/9/2006 4:26:58 PM): i need you to tell me about this please... Tejas Dragon (5/9/2006 4:27:01 PM): ok Majica (5/9/2006 4:27:11 PM): The vampire majica has drunk 3 pints of blood. (Lost In Shadow) Powers: None Location: Yearning and 72nd majica is sire to no other vampires. majica is a second-generation vampire, sired by Majica (29646). Tejas Dragon (5/9/2006 4:27:25 PM): who is that? Majica (5/9/2006 4:27:40 PM): umMmm... you Tejas Dragon (5/9/2006 4:27:47 PM): nope Majica (5/9/2006 4:27:48 PM): ID: QZ0UmkRe Tejas Dragon (5/9/2006 4:28:02 PM): that is one I made to show my daughter how to make a pire Tejas Dragon (5/9/2006 4:28:14 PM): I just used the first name that came in my head Majica (5/9/2006 4:28:19 PM): lol.. alright Majica (5/9/2006 4:28:32 PM): you gonna let her die? Tejas Dragon (5/9/2006 4:28:34 PM): my 8 yr didnt understand how to get a sire and stuff Tejas Dragon (5/9/2006 4:28:37 PM): yea why? Majica (5/9/2006 4:28:59 PM): flattering as it may be... *pout* there's only one maji... just like there's only one tej Majica (5/9/2006 4:29:03 PM): *nudges you* Tejas Dragon (5/9/2006 4:29:04 PM): yep Tejas Dragon (5/9/2006 4:29:20 PM): it was the first name that came to me cause we had been talking and then she wanted to make one
And.. directly from my yahoo archives so let's see if AA/Ceaser will scream to anyone who will listen, that they've been altered.
|
|
|
Post by Do Not PM this Account. on Jun 12, 2009 6:57:02 GMT -8
I wasn't around when it was in the chats, so I'm not sure what it was doing. As for the clone stacking, I didn't check all its childer to find out if they were of the same IDs. I've been busy. I -was- around when tejas threw a fit about it. So that's all I know. >.<
|
|
|
Post by Lestat de Lioncourt on Jun 12, 2009 7:06:53 GMT -8
O.o But ALL black blooding is pretty obvious, lol Mmm, not quite what I meant. Bringing people into this game is fine, but thrall stacking or forum spamming is more of what I was talking about. Like quizzing, or whatever.
|
|
|
Post by ophelia Lokason on Jun 12, 2009 7:26:37 GMT -8
It was three years ago. Posting the conversation really wasn't necessary. (sorry..had to say it..I REALLY dislike conversations being posted, especially unnecessarily) Nor is calling Tejas by her former name when you know she's had it legally changed. You're being deliberately insulting and you're supposed to be above that. And no, I don't subscribe to the ...well so and so does it why can't I. I'm not a big believer in doing what others do, even if it's wrong, just because they did it first. Lastly, thank you again for the information on the two mysterious vampires that have shown up recently. Doubtful we'll find out who they belong to, other than supposition and assumption >< but its just really a goddamn shame to see folks be so stupid when it comes to zero respect to another characters name. (OTHERS BEING GENERAL SO NO ONE CAN JUMP TO THE CONCLUSION THAT I AM REFERRING TO THEM SPECIFICALLY. ANY PARTY THAT FEELS I AM REFERRING TO THEM SPECIFICALLY SHOULD PERHAPS TAKE A LONG LOOK IN THE MIRROR AND DO A GUILT CHECK. AGAIN UNLESS I HAVE GIVEN A SPECIFIC NAME 'OTHERS THEY YOU AND SUCH ARE NON SPECIFIC GENERALIZED TERMS ~end of disclaimer~) ~M
|
|